If the violent protests continue, 'the people' will gladly embrace a police state for their 'safety':
As soon as I saw the video of the Alton Sterling shooting on Wednesday, I had a very, very bad feeling about where this was all headed. In fact, I became so concerned I wrote a post titled, A Period of Major Civil Unrest is Coming – How to Win an Inevitable Confrontation with the Status Quo. Here are a few of the key warnings and suggestions I provided:
Increasingly, the general public is coming to the very unpleasant realization that they live in a corporate oligarchy in which they are subjects rather than citizens. The more they are pushed into a corner, the sooner they will lash out in all sorts of ways.
Unfortunately for us, the horrible massacres that occurred in Dallas are exactly the sort of thing that the status quo wants to see. It further divides the public and it creates a justification for more militarization of the police, more surveillance and less civil liberties. Guess who’s going to be most negatively impacted by all of that? Black people, poor people, and the disenfranchised generally.
Anyone who thinks senseless violence will solve the issues of oppression in America doesn’t understand America or the status quo. Executing police in a premeditated manner gives the establishment credibility, and solidifies its support amongst the silent majority as well as the upper classes. The marginalized cannot win a battle if that’s the case. Period, end of story. If you think otherwise, you’re in for a rude awakening.
Everything necessary to put these United States on total police state lockdown are already firmly in place, I’ve been following it closely for nearly a decade. These things have been put in place not for foreign terrorists, but for the American public once they inevitably revolt against their economic slavery and hopelessness. The powers that be knew all of this was coming, and they are entirely prepared for it. Are you prepared? Senseless violence is the only justification needed to put marginalized Americans in walled ghettos like the Israelis have done to so many Palestinians. Don’t think it can’t happen here? Just watch.
Both President Obama and Hillary Clinton are fueling the ‘war on cops’ to divide the country and exploit the hysteria for political gain, Milwaukee Co. Sheriff Clarke pointed out.
“The Commander-in-Chief opens his mouth and sticks his foot in it… exploiting things that don’t exist,” he told Fox News Friday. “…He didn’t cause this, but you know what, he fuels this sort of anger, this ‘misplaced anger’ about things going on that were thousands of miles away.”
“The [shootings in Louisiana and Minnesota] didn’t happen anywhere near Dallas.”
And Hillary Clinton acted no differently, Sheriff Clarke added.
“We’ve heard from Mrs. Bill Clinton who threw up the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter yesterday and exploited the situation – two situations, one in Louisiana and the other in Minnesota,” he continued. “…[And] President Obama, it’s kinda interesting he said ‘the facts aren’t in’ [because] he’s usually popping off at the mouth before he’s been briefed or before he knows any of the facts, like he did yesterday without any foundation.”
“He talked about racism, disparate treatment, people of color… all this nonsense [accusations before the facts] like I said. He’s armed with powerful words and he uses those words irresponsibly to fuel this sort of anger toward the American police officer and I wish he’d just knock it off.”
As to Jesse Jackson’s claim that Donald Trump was “responsible” for the Dallas massacre, Sheriff Clarke said Jackson was a “blowhard” trying to stay relevant after his time had passed.
"Here's the short version. Whatever power you give politicians and bureaucrats to use against other people will eventually be used by future politicians and bureaucrats against you." -Michael Boldin, Tenth Amendment Center
The Tenth Amendment is one of the clearest evidences that the central government of the united States is not supreme over the sovereign states.
In this recent short clip from the Tenth Amendment Center, TAC founder Michael Boldin explains briefly why the latest move by those in central government to infringe on the rights of law abiding citizens via a secret list is unconstitutional and dangerous.
"Some people are calling for the federal government to restrict the right to keep and bear arms of people who are on the federal government's terrorism watch list," said Boldin. "This is not only unconstitutional, but sets and extremely dangerous precedent for all our rights."
"If the federal government can take away someone else's right to defend themselves simply because it has unilaterally decided to place them on a secret, wildly inaccurate list that's virtually impossible to be removed from, eventually, some bureaucrat is going to find some way to put you on that list for another reason," he continued.
Boldin then went on to cite some of America's founders.
Most notably, Boldin reference Patrick Henry. During the Virginia ratifying convention, he said:
"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them."
Mr. Boldin then broke that down in the simplest of terms.
"Whatever power you give politicians and bureaucrats to use against other people will eventually be used by future politicians and bureaucrats against you."
If you don't believe that, just take a look at the unconstitutional PATRIOT Act put forth by Congress and approved of by the George W. Bush administration, which Americans cheered for because they were scared of Islamic terrorism, rather than take responsibility and demand that such legislation not be enacted because it was criminal and tyrannical. That also led to the unconstitutional agency known as the Department of Homeland Security and the federalizing of airport security, which openly violates the Fourth Amendment.
Later, the Obama administration and Congress decided to make America a battlefield and in the National Defense Authorization Act approval of indefinitely holding people without trial or attorney, violating their rights protected under the Fifth Amendment.
The police massacre in Dallas has forced the Cleveland Police Department to finally respond to the threat posed by increasingly violent left wing protests around the country ahead of the Republican National Convention.
For months, Breitbart News has been sounding the alarm over security concerns at the convention in Cleveland after organized violent protests surrounding presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump around the country. Breitbart Texas warned of possible danger to both convention goers and law enforcement officers in a post by Lana Shadwick titled, “Cops and GOP Convention Goers are Sitting Ducks, Says Cleveland Police Union.”
“The president of the Cleveland Ohio police union warns that cops and convention goers are “sitting ducks” at the 2016 Republican National Convention,” The City of Cleveland is ill-equipped to handle the thousands of professional leftist, Black Lives Matter, and other protesters and there is just under a month to go before the convention.
Tens of thousands of truckers, bikers, Trump supporters and convention delegates are expected to pour into the city during the convention.”
Steve Loomis, president of the Cleveland Police Patrolmen’s Association, told Breitbart Texas that Cleveland city officials are still refusing to heed, some arrogantly so, the recommendations of federal security officials. This is even though the City has procured insurance, as reported, to cover the “anticipated” “large scale rioting.”
The City of Cleveland has asked officers from across the country to help provide security; however, Loomis says he has massive concerns about the safety and security of both his “rank and file officers,” and officers from other cities. He said, “I wouldn’t hold it against them if they decided to pull-out.” He told Breitbart Texas that City officials “Just take, take, take, but need to pretend for a moment that they really care about us.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment