Its been a very very slow boil, probably by design...Just imagine the founding fathers of America coming down now and seeing the state of the nation today. Below are just a few headlines - from a single day - which tell the sad story. But the story isn't over yet and there are a lot of twists and turns to come, one of which involves the harpazo of the bride. That will shock the remaining world, but it will also be used to fasten the already tight grip that governments have on their citizens:







Police and the Border Patrol are using “general crime control checkpoints” to harass and detain motorists across the country. Below is a list of nine different checkpoints police use to ticket and arrest citizens.







Last year, I warned everyone that multiple law enforcement partners are conducting drug (heroin) checkpoints focused on vehicles and pedestrians!


Drug testing checkpoints are a lie…
“If they say drug check lane ahead, it’s false,” says Wichita attorney Dan Monnat. “Because the courts have ruled on this being a violation of the 4th amendment.” (for more info. read City of Indianapolis v Edmond)
And recently, I warned everyone that DHS is paying police departments to set up DUI checkpoints across the country.


To learn how police will soon add a tenth checkpoint to the list, please read on.


Why are police using illegal checkpoints?
Sixteen years ago, the Supreme Court held that checkpoints established for general crime control purposes are unconstitutional. (City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 44 (2000).
So why are police and the Border Patrol stopping innocent motorists?
DHS admits DUI checkpoints are REALLY about checking a person’s immigration status.

Also, there’s millions of dollars at stake. The University of Berkley, which has close ties to DHS, made close to $14 million off of ‘No-Refusal’ checkpoints in 2013.


The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) has awarded UC Berkeley’s Safe Transportation Research & Education Center (SafeTREC) $13,930,555 to run its 2012-2013 Sobriety Checkpoint program. (Source)


Bus checkpoints
When Texas police found 8 kilos of cocaine during a random search of a Greyhound bus, they “created a checkpoint that trespassed on the Constitution,” so the drugs cannot be used as evidence, a federal judge ruled.
Greyhound spokeswoman Lanesha Gipson said its policy is to let police search their buses.
“We fully cooperate with local authorities and allow them to board the bus to do a search if they ask to do so,” Gipson said in an email.

So far, this makes bus checkpoints the tenth different police checkpoint.
Police use checkpoints to threaten motorists and cite them for violations

Police use checkpoints as a new “stop & frisk” method
FOIA documents released to the ACLU, show that the Border Patrol’s extra-constitutional police practices amount to a de facto policy of “stop and frisk” for residents within 100 miles of the border.


Police are even stopping motorists who avoid checkpoints
According to page 8 of the University of North Carolina’s “motor vehicle checkpoint” article:

The purpose of any checkpoint . . . would be defeated if drivers had the option to “legally avoid,” ignore or circumvent the checkpoint . . .


Police set up checkpoint “enforcement zones” to keep civilian monitors out
According to a Tuscon Sentinel article earlier this year, civilian “monitors” set up chairs across from a CBP checkpoint in Arivaca, AZ and began taking notes. But when they came back the next day, the checkpoint was roped off with signs that read: “No pedestrians.”

Wake up America – this is the police state we live in, where cops use at least TEN different types of checkpoints to threaten, ticket, and arrest anyone without fear of reprisal.









The release of thousands of pages of documents has revealed that California law enforcement have secretly acquired social media monitoring tools that focus on activists.


The American Civil Liberties Union of California has obtained thousands of pages of documents pertaining to California law enforcement agencies secretly purchasing social media surveillance software. The ACLU of California filed open records requests with 63 police departments, sheriffs, and district attorneys across California and found that at least 20 agencies across California are in possession of social media monitoring tools.

“We found no evidence in the documents of any public notice, debate, community input, or lawmaker vote about use of this invasive surveillance,” the ACLU writes. “And no agency produced a use policy that would limit how the tools were used and help protect civil rights and civil liberties.”









 In a stunning new documentary released just today, I reveal how politically correct speech control (thought control) gave rise to Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich. The film reveals how the phenomenon of progressive fanaticism -- safe spaces, social justice warriors, microaggressions, generation snowflake crybullies -- mirrors the Brownshirts of Nazi Germany and escalates demands for obedience into physical violence against innocents.


Click here to watch the film now on YouTube (at least until they ban it).

We're already seeing a similar phenomenon today with numerous Black Lives Matter terrorist shootings of police officers, beatings of innocent people merely because they are white, and calls for extreme acts of violence against police officers and Caucasians. The aggressive, violent behavior of "progressive fanatics" is now mirroring the rise of the Third Reich that eventually led to genocide and the mass murder of millions.


FYI, "Nazi" means "National Socialism." The Third Reich is often incorrectly described as a "far right" regime. It was actually an extreme rendition of corporate-government fascism, a powerful centralized socialist government, and the kind of strict demands for cultural obedience that we frequency see from the extreme left. Some of the big issues that characterized the Nazi government were gun control, forced euthanasia, an expansion of entitlement handouts and the invocation of "science" as the justification behind genocide. 

We see all these same theme today from the political left. California SB 277, for example, a genocidal medical experiment conducted on children by the state government, was pushed by a radical leftist child killer named Sen. Richard Pan (who would have been right at home in the Third Reich).


America's social justice warriors are intolerant, racist bigots who are a real threat to a peaceful society



Just as in Nazi Germany, today's "social justice warriors" are intolerant, racist, bigoted instigators of violence, and they seek political power at the expense of innocents. While disavowing the legitimacy of law in a peaceful society, today's P.C. fanatics -- including lunatic leftist university students -- demand the mass disarmament of private citizens by a totalitarian government, following in lockstep with the early days of Nazi Germany when gun confiscation preceded genocide.


With students in the United States now being vilified for saying that "all lives matter," we have entered a realm of extreme leftist lunacy that cannot be ended with reason or any appeal to logic. The violent rhetoric and destructive actions of the political left have now gone beyond the point of no return, leading America to the exact outcome desired by globalist instigators like George Soros: civil war.


Soros and other seek to tear America apart from within. Seething with hatred for humanity, destructive people of high influence -- like Adolf Hitler, George Soros and Barack Obama -- use their positions to enslave people rather than setting them free. They create conflict rather than preventing it... and they use words as weapons to keep people down rather than as tools to empower individuals.










If you think Agenda 21 was bad, you ain’t seen nothing yet. Wait until you learn what the creepily utopian 2030 Agenda has in store for us all.

Once again Germany has stepped forward with their ideas of how to speed up the arrival of a one-world government.
While all eyes were on Obama and his creepily NWO speech,  the German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier gave an address which went largely un-noticed.  It was a lengthy speech – you can read his entire address here – but these are some takeaway points:

Agenda 2030 emphasizes gender and racial equality, eradication of poverty, and the total abolition of violence and hate. It lays out that the future world is based entirely on these goals and that the only way to achieve these things is through sustainable development and control of climate change. Oh – and the planet will also be totally poverty free by 2030 as well.

Here are a few of the pertinent points:
  • It actually came into effect in January 2016.
  • Its full title is ‘Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
  • The  areas covered by the Agenda are people, planet, prosperity, peace, and partnership.
  • The 17 goals and 169 targets of the Agenda seek to build on the Millennium Development Goals  and complete those that were not achieved.
  • The ‘Declaration’ agreed upon at the United Nations meeting in New York has 53 points.
  • Point 2 sets the tone: ‘On behalf of the peoples we serve, we have adopted a historic decision on a comprehensive, far-reaching and people-centred set of universal and transformative goals and targets. We commit ourselves to working tirelessly for the full implementation of this Agenda by 2030’. 

Points 5, 18, 28, and particularly point 29 are particularly interesting. Now, in theory, it’s wonderful – rainbows and unicorns for everyone. It’s repetitive in the extreme, constantly pointing out the sanctity of sovereign nations and saying these issues apply TO EVERY SINGLE PERSON ON THE PLANET…
So, how can I turn the 2030 Agenda into the arrival of the one-world government?
Simple: it is entirely impossible to achieve what they have laid out without a one-world government, the New World Order we have heard so much about over the last few yea
Achieving ANY of the goals on that list is impossible unless one single government calls the shots and enforces conditions whereby the goals become achievable. That means the removal of sovereign status for individual nations. It means one giant money pot made up of cash from every nation that has cash to finance these initiatives.
Globalism just took on a whole new meaning.









With the passing of JADE Helm 15 and UWEX 16 it seems a fair question. When this was originally written the tensions were nowhere near as high as we see today. Killer cops, while plentiful at the time, were not making the news on a daily or weekly basis. BLM wasn’t destroying neighborhoods on a bi-monthly basis and the lies about our economy were still being swallowed. We have entered, in my opinion, a much more dangerous time in the U.S.. A time that has not been seen on this soil in a couple of hundred years. Let’s hope that history is not repeating or should we hope it is repeating?

Dave Hodges of The Common Sense Show recently penned, The Psychological Reasons Why American Soldiers Would Fire On American Citizens. Wether you agree or disagree with his analysis is up to you, I am not here to say they will or will not. Daisy Luther, The Organic Prepper, penned Rebuttal: Here’s Why I Do NOT Believe American Soldiers Will Fire on Protesting American Citizens stating she believed they would not. Personally, I believe some would, but the vast majority would uphold their Oath to defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic.

We live in a time that is as unstable as the world has ever seen. The instability is not confined to a particular region or group of people or even a nation. It is global. This global instability has been brought on by the banksters, the central banking system specifically and to pinpoint the exact demon, the Federal Reserve system in the United States. With the power to control the worlds currency, the sociopaths have token charge of most of the worlds economies. This is not speculation on my part. When Rothschild uttered his famous quote about being in charge of a nations money, he wasn’t kidding and, sadly, he was spot on. When the sociopaths at the Federal Reserve began their reign of terror in the United States the world was just beginning to recover from World War I and the banksters in the United States had just about destroyed the economy of the country. Their gambling on the stock market had put them on the brink of insolvency. Sound familiar? It should, it is exactly where we have been starting in 2007 or earlier.

When the Twin Towers came down in 2001 everything changed. The federal government, in concert with the banksters, began taking over the “security” of our country. Mister cheney did all he could to put into place an absolute police state through fear, terror tactics and legislation. OBomba has actually built on this legacy left by the bush/cheney regime and ramped everything up to the next level. Militarized police, executive orders that are dictatorial in nature along with escalating the unConstitutional wars around the world. Not only has obomba continued the program of unConstitutional wars, but he began seeking direction from the UN in regards to the obombing of Libya.

With this as the back drop I ask you, will they fire on us? Will we awaken to find people in uniforms in our neighborhoods pointing weapons at us? Maybe we should ask the citizens of Ferguson, MO; or the citizens in Waco, TX; or the Weaver family in Ruby Ridge, ID; or the Bundy family in Bunkerville, NV; or ask the families of the Kent State students. Maybe they can answer this question. If history is one of our best teachers, this is a lesson we should all study a little more intently.